After reading another, more inferior, blog this morning, I have decided to poach their subject material and create my own post on the same subject. They discussed the possibility that all humans are supposed to be part of a pair. Initially, I'd like to point out that I am single, and therefore possibly slightly biased to disagreeing with this opinion. but nevertheless, I will attempt to give arguments for and against the proposal of Innate Human Coupledom.
Evidence Against Innate Human Coupledom:
I'd like to discuss Valentines Day Propaganda, and the effect that this has on people's view of Innate Human Coupledom. Starting towards the middle of January, we are inundated with advertisements for dating websites, florists, and all manner of aphrodisiac flaunting chocolate companies with their highly suggestive slogans for what 'she'd like' this valentines day. We all know what she'd like - and it sure as hell aint a tinny piece of crap metal on her finger and the threat that she will be permanently attached to the hip of a sexually inferior animal named man for the rest of her sexually active life. Just get her some chocolate and a god damned vibrator and leave her be; she doesn't need your promises and proposals, she just needs your penis.
Evidence For Innate Human Coupledom:
PMT - women, at that time of the month, seem to not only despise being single and curled up alone on the single sofa of doom, but they also physically and mentally despise the thought that they will indeed be alone forever. No amount of chocolate and no hoard of stimulating play things can satisfy the insatiable hunger for a man to be 'hers'. She doesn't just want a boyfriend - oh no - she wants a man with her name tattooed on his arse in big thick black letters, she wants a pre-nup agreement stating that he can't divorce her under any circumstances, and most of all she wants him permanently attached to the sofa of doom in a ready-to-rub-her-feet-and-anything-else-that-might-need-rubbing position. She can't live without him - she NEEDS to be part of an impenetrable pair.
As you can see, it's a tricky subject to tackle, and I haven't really reached a conclusion. This is where you could help - answer me this: Are we supposed to be part of a pair - is there such a thing as Innate Human Coupledom - and are women just too fucking needy?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
women always think the grass is greener. when we are single we want to be part of a couple and when we are in a couple, we want to be single.
It's that simple!
From my own personal experience... you find that they're not permanently attached to the sofa-of-doom when you need them to be.
And they won't rub anything (including feet) without getting something rubbed in return.
I think it's definitely a grass is greener case.
Post a Comment